When it comes to prop trading, two names often rise to the forefront of discussions: My Forex Funds (MFF) and FTMO. These two leading firms offer opportunities for traders to manage substantial capital in exchange for a share of profits, but each has its own set of features, benefits, and drawbacks. In this article, we will dive deep into a comparison between MFF and FTMO, analyzing their offerings in terms of account types, evaluation process, profit splits, withdrawal conditions, and more. By the end, you’ll have a clearer understanding of which firm suits your trading goals.
What Is Prop Trading?
Before we dive into the specifics of MFF and FTMO, it’s essential to understand prop trading. In a proprietary trading setup, firms provide traders with capital to trade on their behalf. In return, traders typically share a percentage of their profits with the firm. This allows traders to leverage larger amounts of capital than they would have access to with personal funds, significantly increasing the potential for profits.
MFF and FTMO are two prominent prop trading firms in the forex and CFD markets. They have structured programs to help traders grow their accounts, and the evaluation process for joining their platforms is relatively straightforward.
My Forex Funds (MFF) vs FTMO: A Side-by-Side Comparison
Let’s break down the key features of both platforms to help you decide which one best aligns with your trading style and goals.
1. Evaluation Process: How to Get Started
MFF Evaluation Process
MFF offers a two-phase evaluation process for traders who want to join their platform. The first phase involves passing a demo account challenge, where you must reach a profit target within a specified period. In this phase, you must adhere to certain drawdown limits and follow other risk management rules.
Once you pass the demo phase, you move to phase two, which is similar to the first but with real capital. During this phase, you must again meet profit targets and follow the risk rules. This evaluation process is designed to ensure that you can handle real-money trading before MFF entrusts you with their funds.
FTMO Evaluation Process
FTMO follows a very similar structure with its two-step evaluation. First, you begin with the FTMO Challenge, which requires you to meet a profit target within a specific timeframe while keeping your drawdown below a predetermined level. Once you complete this challenge successfully, you proceed to the Verification Phase, where you must demonstrate consistent profitability before being offered an FTMO funded account.
What sets FTMO apart is its emphasis on psychological testing through the evaluation process. FTMO not only evaluates your ability to generate profits but also your ability to stick to trading rules under emotional stress, a critical aspect of successful trading.
2. Account Types and Funding Options
MFF Account Types
MFF offers a variety of account types, each designed to cater to different trader profiles. The accounts come in multiple funding levels, allowing traders to choose the amount of capital they wish to manage. The Classic Account, Rapid Account, and Accelerated Account are the primary offerings, each with distinct profit-sharing and evaluation terms.
- Classic Account: Designed for those who prefer a straightforward, low-risk approach.
- Rapid Account: Best for traders who want quicker access to funding, with some additional evaluation rules.
- Accelerated Account: This is MFF’s most aggressive program, ideal for experienced traders who can handle larger sums of capital and higher risk.
FTMO Account Types
FTMO also provides several account options, including Standard and Aggressive account types. FTMO is known for offering larger initial funding in comparison to MFF, starting from $10,000 up to $200,000. The firm provides flexible profit split options, giving traders the chance to choose between different fee structures, including higher profit splits for larger capital.
Both FTMO and MFF allow traders to manage significant sums, but FTMO’s higher capital limits may appeal to traders who want to work with larger amounts of money from the start.
3. Profit Split and Funding Conditions
MFF Profit Split
MFF offers competitive profit splits, with traders typically receiving up to 75% of the profits for a successful trade. In the Classic account, the profit split is often around 75%, and in the Rapid Account, it can reach up to 85%. MFF has a flexible withdrawal system, allowing traders to make withdrawals as soon as they meet the requirements.
One of the most attractive features of MFF is that they provide the potential for scaling accounts, which means that as traders prove their ability to generate consistent profits, they can request larger capital allocations.
FTMO Profit Split
FTMO provides some of the highest profit splits in the industry. Traders can expect up to 90% of the profits from successful trades, making it an attractive option for highly skilled traders. FTMO is transparent about its fee structure and outlines clear guidelines for withdrawals and profit sharing.
FTMO also offers a scaling plan, allowing traders to grow their accounts with consistent performance. Unlike MFF, FTMO has a minimum payout condition and requires traders to meet certain performance criteria to be eligible for higher account levels.
4. Risk Management and Drawdown Limits
Both MFF and FTMO implement strict risk management protocols to protect their capital and ensure that traders follow sound trading practices.
MFF Risk Management
MFF sets clear drawdown limits for each account, ensuring that traders can’t risk too much of the firm’s capital in a single trade or over the course of the evaluation period. The drawdown limits are relatively generous compared to some other firms, offering flexibility while still maintaining a robust risk management framework.
For example, in the Rapid Account, MFF’s drawdown limit might be around 12%, with traders needing to manage the risk carefully to avoid losing too much. The Classic Account has stricter limits, requiring a smaller risk per trade.
FTMO Risk Management
FTMO’s risk management system is also well-structured, with drawdown limits that depend on the size of the account. The most common drawdown limits are between 5% and 10% for each trade, and overall daily drawdowns are limited to around 10%. FTMO emphasizes risk control as part of their evaluation criteria, and traders are expected to demonstrate their ability to trade within these limits consistently.
FTMO also offers a Flexibility Plan for experienced traders, allowing them more room to manage risk while still adhering to the overall risk parameters.
5. Withdrawals and Fees
MFF Withdrawal Policy
MFF provides relatively easy withdrawal options for traders. After passing the evaluation, traders can request payouts on a monthly basis. The withdrawal process is seamless, and MFF charges a minimal fee for this service. The amount traders can withdraw is directly tied to their profit-sharing agreement.
FTMO Withdrawal Policy
FTMO’s withdrawal policy is also straightforward. They allow monthly payouts, and traders can request withdrawals as soon as they have accumulated enough profit. FTMO has a minimum payout threshold of around $100, making it relatively easy to access your earnings. They do not charge fees for withdrawals, but there is a scaling plan for traders who want to increase their account balance over time.
6. Additional Features and Support
Both MFF and FTMO provide exceptional customer support, but there are key differences in terms of additional services and features.
MFF Additional Features
MFF offers trader support resources, including a trading academy to help new traders enhance their skills. They also provide tools for social trading and community engagement, allowing traders to share strategies and insights.
FTMO Additional Features
FTMO is known for its trader community and educational resources. They provide a wealth of training materials for traders and offer 24/7 customer support. FTMO also has a unique FTMO Trading Challenge that helps traders enhance their skills by simulating live market conditions.
Conclusion: MFF or FTMO?
Ultimately, the decision between MFF and FTMO depends on your individual trading style and goals. If you prefer lower entry requirements, flexibility in evaluation, and potentially higher profit splits, MFF might be the better choice. On the other hand, if you’re looking for larger capital allocations, higher profit splits, and a robust risk management framework, FTMO could be the ideal option.
Both firms have their own unique advantages, and it’s essential to carefully assess which evaluation process, profit sharing, and withdrawal policies align best with your needs. No matter which one you choose, both offer great opportunities for traders looking to scale their careers in proprietary trading.
For more information, you can explore the original article on MFF vs FTMO here.